[1]李亚楠,张起,古恩鹏.手术与非手术治疗肱骨近端骨折的Meta分析[J].中医正骨,2018,30(09):42-48.
 LI Yanan,ZHANG Qi,GU Enpeng.Comparison of operative treatment and non-operative treatment for treatment of proximal humeral fractures:a meta analysis[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2018,30(09):42-48.
点击复制

手术与非手术治疗肱骨近端骨折的Meta分析()
分享到:

《中医正骨》[ISSN:1001-6015/CN:41-1162/R]

卷:
第30卷
期数:
2018年09期
页码:
42-48
栏目:
文献研究
出版日期:
2018-09-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
Comparison of operative treatment and non-operative treatment for treatment of proximal humeral fractures:a meta analysis
作者:
李亚楠1张起2古恩鹏2
1.天津中医药大学,天津 300380; 2.天津市滨海新区中医医院,天津 300450
Author(s):
LI Yanan1ZHANG Qi2GU Enpeng2
1.Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Tianjin 300380,China 2.Tianjin Binhai New District Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Tianjin 300450,China
关键词:
肩骨折 肱骨骨折 手术 非手术治疗 随机对照试验 Meta分析 系统评价
Keywords:
shoulder fractures humeral fractures operative treatment non-operative treatment randomized controlled trial Meta-analysis systematic review
摘要:
比较手术与非手术治疗肱骨近端骨折的临床疗效和安全性。方法:应用计算机检索CNKI、万方、维普、PubMed、Embase、Cochrance Lirbary建库至2018年4月国内外公开发表的手术与非手术治疗肱骨近端骨折的随机对照研究文献。由2位研究者严格按照纳入与排除标准独立筛选文献并提取资料,采用Cochrane风险偏倚评估工具进行文献方法学质量评价后,采用Review 5.3软件进行Meta分析。结果:最初检索出1212篇相关文献,通过详细阅读文章标题、摘要及全文,最终纳入9篇文献,均为英文文献。纳入研究的对象共585例,手术组288例、非手术组297例。Meta分析结果显示,2组Constant-Murley肩关节评分、远期肌肉力量评分、欧洲五维健康量表评分、肱骨头缺血性坏死发生率、骨折不愈合率、骨关节炎发生率、再手术率、神经损伤发生率、死亡率比较,组间差异均无统计学意义[WMD=-0.90,95%CI(-4.18,2.37); WMD=-1.14,95%CI(-2.83,0.54); WMD=0.02,95%CI(-0.02,0.06); RR=0.92,95%CI(0.58,1.48); RR=0.59,95%CI(0.24,1.47); RR=0.59,95%CI(0.21,1.62); RR=2.04,95%CI(1.13,3.71); RR=1.26,95%CI(0.40,3.92); RR=1.58,95%CI(0.76,3.29)],手术组的远期疼痛评分低于非手术组[WMD=1.77,95%CI(0.72,2.81)]。结论:手术与非手术治疗肱骨近端骨折,均能改善肩关节功能,提高患者生存质量,二者的安全性相当,但手术治疗在改善远期疼痛方面优于非手术治疗。
Abstract:
To compare the clinical curative effects and safety of operative treatment versus non-operative treatment for treatment of proximal humeral fractures.Methods:All the randomized controlled trial(RCT)articles about operative treatment(operative group)versus non-operative treatment(non-operative group)for treatment of proximal humeral fractures that published at home and abroad included from database establishing to April 2018 were retrieved from China national knowledge internet,WanFang Data,Vip Data,PubMed,Embase and Cochrance Lirbary through computer.The articles were screened and the information was extracted independently and strictly by two searchers according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria.The methodological quality of research in the articles was evaluated by using Cochrane risk bias assessment tools,and a Meta-analysis was conducted by using Review 5.3 software.Results:One thousand two hundred and twelve articles were searched out.After screening through reading titles,abstracts and full texts of the articles in detail,9 English articles(585 patients)were included in the final analysis,288 patients in operative group and 297 patients in non-operative group.The results of Meta-analysis demonstrated that there was no statistical difference in Constant-Murley shoulder scores,long-term muscle strength scores,European quality of life 5-dimensions(EQ-5D)scores and the incidence rate of ischemic necrosis of humeral head,fracture nonunion,osteoarthritis,reoperation,nerve injuries and death between the 2 groups(WMD=-0.90,95%CI(-4.18,2.37); WMD=-1.14,95%CI(-2.83,0.54); WMD=0.02,95%CI(-0.02,0.06); RR=0.92,95%CI(0.58,1.48); RR=0.59,95%CI(0.24,1.47); RR=0.59,95%CI(0.21,1.62); RR=2.04,95%CI(1.13,3.71); RR=1.26,95%CI(0.40,3.92); RR=1.58,95%CI(0.76,3.29)).The long-term pain scores were lower in operative group compared to non-operative group(WMD=1.77,95%CI(0.72,2.81)).Conclusion:Both operative treatment and non-operative treatment can effectively improve patient's shoulder function and life quality in treatment of proximal humeral fractures.They are similar to each other in safety,however,the former surpasses the latter in improving the long-term pain.

参考文献/References:

[1] BARRETT JA,BARON JA,KARAGAS MR,et al.Fracture risk in the U.S. Medicare population[J].J Clin Epidemiol,1999,52(3):243-249.
[2] COURT-BROWN CM,CAESAR B.Epidemiology of adult fractures: A review[J].Injury,2006,37(8):691-697.
[3] HANDOLL HH,BRORSON S.Interventions for treating proximal humeral fractures in adults[J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev,2003,12(12):73-74.
[4] LIND T,KRØNER K,JENSEN J.The epidemiology of fractures of the proximal humerus[J].Arch Orthop Trauma Surg,1989,108(5):285-287.
[5] DAI J,CHAI Y,WANG C,et al.Meta-analysis comparing locking plate fixation with hemiarthroplasty for complex proximal humeral fractures[J].Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol,2014,24(3):305-313.
[6] NEER CS 2ND.Displaced proximal humeral fractures. I. Classification and evaluation[J].J Bone Joint Surg Am,1970,52(6):1077-1089.
[7] BOONS HW,GOOSEN JH,VAN GRINSVEN S,et al.Hemiarthroplasty for humeral four-part fractures for patients 65 years and older:a randomized controlled trial[J].Clin Orthop Relat Res,2012,470(12):3483-3491.
[8] FJALESTAD T,HOLE MØ,JØRGENSEN JJ,et al.Health and cost Consequences of surgical versus conservative treatment for a comminuted proximal humeral fracture in elderly patients[J].Injury,2010,41(6):599-605.
[9] FJALESTAD T,HOLE MØ,HOVDEN IA,et al.Surgical treatment with an angular stable plate for complex displaced proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients:a randomized controlled trial[J].J Orthop Trauma,2012,26(2):98-106.
[10] FJALESTAD T,HOLE MØ.Displaced proximal humeral fractures:operative versus non-operative treatment—a 2-year extension of a randomized controlled trial[J].Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol,2014,24(7):1067-1073.
[11] OLERUD P,AHRENGART L,PONZER S,et al.Hemiarthroplasty versus nonoperative treatment of displaced 4-part proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients:a randomized controlled trial[J].J Shoulder Elbow Surg,2011,20(7):1025-1033.
[12] OLERUD P,AHRENGART L,PONZER S,et al.Internal fixation versus nonoperative treatment of displaced 3-part proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients:a randomized controlled trial[J].J Shoulder Elbow Surg,2011,20(5):747-755.
[13] RANGAN A,HANDOLL H,BREALEY S,et al.Surgical vs nonsurgical treatment of adults with displaced fractures of the proximal humerus:the PROFHER randomized clinical trial[J].JAMA,2015,313(10):1037-1047.[14] STABLEFORTH PG.Four-part fractures of the neck of the humerus[J].J Bone Joint Surg Br,1984,66(1):104-108.
[15] ZYTO K,AHRENGART L,SPERBER A,et al.Treatment of displaced proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients[J].J Bone Joint Surg Br,1997,79(1):181-182.
[16] HACKSHAW A,KIRKWOOD A.Interpreting and reporting clinical trials with results of borderline significance[J].BMJ,2011,343:3340.
[17] 陈彦影,徐龙,黄富国.老年肱骨近端三、四部分骨折手术与保守治疗的Meta分析[J].华西医学,2015,30(11):2040-2045.

相似文献/References:

[1]刘磊,万春友,全先辉,等.锁定钢板内固定结合肱骨头植骨重建治疗 肱骨近端Neer三、四部分骨折[J].中医正骨,2015,27(10):52.
[2]任维龙,李刚,许波,等.骨原发性非霍奇金淋巴瘤1例[J].中医正骨,2015,27(02):73.
[3]江涛,史俊德,梁梯.江林主任医师运用自制弹性牵引器械治疗四肢创伤的经验总结[J].中医正骨,2016,28(05):70.
[4]蒋拥军,李克军,陈佳旭,等.荣肌揉筋手法治疗成人肱骨髁间骨折术后肘关节僵硬[J].中医正骨,2016,28(06):21.
 JIANG Yongjun,LI Kejun,CHEN Jiaxu,et al.Rongji Roujin(荣肌揉筋)manipulation for treatment of postoperative elbow joint stiffness in adults with humeral intercondylar fracture[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2016,28(09):21.
[5]胡和军,吴法强,邓雄伟,等.骨皮质切剥术联合生龙接骨胶囊口服治疗四肢长骨干骨折不愈合[J].中医正骨,2016,28(10):64.
[6]王冲,宁凡友.解剖锁定加压钢板内固定联合自体髂骨板植骨治疗肱骨干骨折不愈合[J].中医正骨,2017,29(02):62.
[7]姜献,周红云,许超,等.肱骨近端骨折钢板内固定术后常见并发症的研究进展[J].中医正骨,2018,30(05):34.
[8]邢金明.切开复位锁定钢板内固定术和人工半肩关节置换术 治疗老年肱骨近端复杂骨折的对比研究[J].中医正骨,2015,27(08):11.
 XING Jinming.A retrospective trial of open reduction and locking plate internal fixation versus artificial shoulder hemiarthroplasty for complicated proximal humeral fractures in old patients[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2015,27(09):11.
[9]盛红枫,张玉柱.微创锁定钢板内固定配合中药内服治疗肱骨近端骨折[J].中医正骨,2015,27(04):49.
[10]孙鹏,谭磊,阎乾,等.人工肱骨头置换术治疗老年肱骨近端Neer三、四部分骨折[J].中医正骨,2016,28(05):43.
[11]方 铭.“T”形双切口锁定钢板内固定治疗老年肱骨近端骨折[J].中医正骨,2016,28(05):46.
[12]张国文.肱骨近端锁定接骨板内固定治疗肱骨近端骨折[J].中医正骨,2016,28(08):50.
[13]贾柯,徐克武,胡翔.老年肱骨近端骨折分型及临床治疗进展[J].中医正骨,2017,29(03):24.
[14]柴浩,张磊,孙荣鑫.半关节成形术和反式肩关节置换术治疗老年肱骨近端Neer三、四部分骨折的对比研究[J].中医正骨,2017,29(07):21.
 CHAI Hao,ZHANG Lei,SUN Rongxin.A comparative study of hemiarthroplasty versus reverse shoulder arthroplasty for treatment of Neer 3-part and 4-part proximal humeral fractures in the aged[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2017,29(09):21.
[15]姚华海,孙龙泰,崔龙慷,等.肩峰下前外侧入路与胸大肌三角肌入路锁定钢板内固定治疗老年肱骨近端二、三部分骨折的对比研究[J].中医正骨,2017,29(09):1.
 YAO Huahai,SUN Longtai,CUI Longkang,et al.A comparative study of locking plate internal fixation through subacromial anterolateral approach versus ectopectoralis-deltoid approach for treatment of Neer 2-part and 3-part proximal humeral fractures in the aged[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2017,29(09):1.
[16]刘丹琼.手法复位杉树皮夹板固定联合补肾活血汤口服 治疗老年肱骨近端骨折肾虚血瘀证的临床研究[J].中医正骨,2018,30(08):16.
 LIU Danqiong.A clinical study of manipulative reduction and fir-bark splint external fixation combined with oral application of Bushen Huoxue Tang(补肾活血汤)for treatment of kidney-deficiency-blood-stasis-type proximal humeral fractures in the aged LIU Danqiong[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2018,30(09):16.
[17]刘凯,尚如国,梁志超,等.老年肱骨近端骨折后肩关节功能恢复的影响因素分析[J].中医正骨,2018,30(09):39.
 LIU Kai,SHANG Ruguo,LIANG Zhichao,et al.Analysis of factors influencing shoulder function recovery after proximal humeral fractures in the aged[J].The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology,2018,30(09):39.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
基金项目:天津市卫生和计划生育委员会中医、中西医结合科研课题(2017097) 通讯作者:古恩鹏 E-mail:guenpeng1967@163.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2018-09-20